Sunday, November 1, 2026

"Never Again" Again

It's time for my annual Remembrance Day post. I've drawn from several essays, including my own, to make my case against a tradition that is moving away from its original message of peace and, of what we should be remembering; the horrors of war and "Never Again."

---

First are some excerpts from an excellent essay I came across several years ago. I cannot find it any longer on the web, but I thankfully had copied the text and saved it in a document along with other essays denouncing the sadly changing message of Remembrance Day:

"...A human life is a human life. When we stand on Remembrance Day, when we wear our poppies, we remember the soldiers who paid the ultimate sacrifice for the misguided political maneuvering of their masters. Government officials and community leaders make speeches passionately thankful of the sacrifices made by these soldiers that their predecessors once sent to their deaths. Yet one rarely hears of the suffering faced by far more, the innocent men, women, and children who have their lives torn apart by the feuding of powerful men. Civilians are the true casualties of war. Nearly 10 million civilian casualties in the First World War, 50 million in the Second...  To what end?

We sit here, living our lives, ignorant or indifferent to the hundred million innocents who have perished in the past century alone, their hands never having held a weapon. Yet we rally together wearing poppies and hearing speeches about those men our governments have either forced or hired to be trained in the art of systematic murder for political gain. Remembrance Day is but a tool, used to desensitize the public to the brutality of war and to cover the true cost in a gleaming coat of patriotism and poppies. Those who are disinclined to acquiesce are derided and publicly scorned for their lack of patriotism, their loyalties questioned. They must hate freedom. 

We ought to be standing together in solemn reflection of the horrors and death caused by war and thinking in unity but one thought: never again. If this were the theme of Remembrance Day, the collective voice of the national population could alone prevent politically motivated conflict. But instead, we lionize those who’ve been trained to kill and have massacred people across the world on behalf of the government."

- author unknown

---

From https://anotherangrywoman.com/2015/11/04/i-dont-wear-poppies-and-this-image-perfectly-encapsulates-why/ :

"The poppy was once a symbol to remind us of the senseless massacre of millions upon millions of people in muddy fields far away from home. The poppy was supposed to say never again to the horrors of a spat between politicians murdering a generation. What it is now is a symbol of militarism, and standard used to recruit children to don a uniform and go off and get themselves killed. It means the opposite of what it is supposed to.

I admit I’d stopped wearing the red poppy about six or seven years ago. I am not sure if it was because my eyes opened to what it symbolizes these days, or whether it was because the poppy itself had become twisted into a mark of jingoism. The trend certainly seems to have grown stronger in recent years.

Policing of wearing the poppy has grown absurd: public figures face attacks, all the way up to death threats, for not wearing one.

Meanwhile, opinion pieces glorifying the deaths in the First World War seem to be on the rise, with pundits and politicians alike acting as though it was anything other than a meaningless mass killing...

And now it all becomes clearer than ever. They want us to forget what happened and pretend – as they did a hundred years ago – as though wars are nothing more than a jolly good lark.

Instead of the symbols, the reminders, we should focus on actually remembering. On remembering, one sees the brutal senselessness of this slaughter."

---

From https://www.saltwire.com/prince-edward-island/opinion/josh-underhay-never-again-never-forget-161987/ :

"Remembrance Day means many things to different people. Some folks still actively serve, some know a friend or family member who served, and some even know someone who died. Emotions and discussion around it can be varied.

But I have to be honest. Here is how it affected me.

As I stood before the tomb, covered with poppies, replete with pageantry, surrounded by Instagrammers, photographers, but also veterans, and all sorts of people, I could only picture one thing.

Some poor soul dying alone in the dirt.

The reality of the dark side of all this is that this soldier, this civilian, died with no glory. Deaths from war happen far from parades, from flags flying, and from politician’s speeches. It happens around the world from the offices in which the decisions are made.

I walked away from the monument and I felt overcome with emotion. Normally I'm a pretty chill person. Today I was overcome with rage at the injustice that allows young men and women to be butchered in the name of politics, of racism, of 'good intentions'.

For me, Remembrance Day is far from the glory of war.

It is a funeral.

The act of remembrance is an act of acknowledging the horror of senseless death. Our men and women who serve and have served deserve the best. They deserve the best of support after they come home having served, many with PTSD, injured, maimed, if they come home at all. Civilians around the world deserve peace and the dignity of life. We all deserve a peaceful world.

I come away from this with a renewed determination to work towards peace. I will denounce the voices that call for conflict, who call for division and difference to be solved through bullets and blood. I support our military, the men and women who serve, and think they deserve not to be used as pawns by those with dark agendas.

I support civilians everywhere who fear the sound of jets overhead, of bombs, and who themselves seek refuge of conflict, repercussions of which come back to decisions we make in wealth and privilege, and at the ballot box.

I will remember those who died. I will remember those who called for their deaths.

Never forget. Never again."

- Josh Underhay 

---

I will finish with three blog posts of my own from previous Remembrance Days:


The World Wars and their aftermath are long gone. Or are they?

The annual “red poppy” campaign resumes in full swing each November. You’ll find red poppies adorning lapels everywhere. The campaign raises money for needy and/or disabled war veterans in Canada. I have no problem with that.

However I must take issue with the ceremonies of Remembrance Day wherein we pay tribute to those who lost their lives supposedly fighting for my freedom. The Royal Canadian Legion describes the red poppy as a “visual pledge to never forget all those Canadians who have fallen in war and military operations”.

If I am to mourn those who died due to the madness of war, then I mourn every soldier who died; regardless of which “side” they were on.

World War II was over eighty years ago, and no participants are alive to remember and explain the incomprehensible mess known as World War I (and its armistice from which Remembrance Day originated, lest we forget). Yet we continue with this ceremony — replete with pipe and drum corps, color guards, police, soldiers, medals, flags, and banners — now also honoring the veterans of Korea or Afghanistan or some other dubious or idiotic military endeavor.

I refuse to support “our” troops or to take place in a military ceremony commemorating “our” fallen comrades, lest “we” forget. I refuse to oppose those dirty rotten “others”. This “us” vs. “them” mentality is what brings about war in the first place. Is it not obvious that this is the source of all conflict?

As Jiddu Krishnamurti said, "When you call yourself an Indian or a Muslim or a Christian or a European, or anything else, you are being violent. Do you see why it is violent? Because you are separating yourself from the rest of mankind. When you separate yourself by belief, by nationality, by tradition, it breeds violence. So a man who is seeking to understand violence does not belong to any country, to any religion, to any political party or partial system; he is concerned with the total understanding of mankind."

On the other hand, the poem In Flanders Fields exhorts us to “Take up our quarrel with the foe...”

What foe?

All persons on this planet are my brothers and sisters. We are undeniably tied to everyone and everything. When we fight someone else, we fight ourselves. We create enemies that don’t really exist.

To put an end to war forever, we need a new direction. But where do we go? Who do we turn to? The UN? NATO? Our elected “leaders”? Organized religion? (God help us). No. None of these have ever demonstrated the ability to bring about lasting peace, and they never will.

We need to realize our connection to each other; and not just realize it intellectually, but actually feel it and live it. It must be a full time occupation. We must abandon our egocentric thoughts and behavior in favor of an identity with the Whole of existence. This is the only thing that will prevent large scale conflicts altogether. Only you, the individual — who, in reality, is not an individual but a part of the Whole — can create peace. It must come from within.

Only peaceful souls can effect a peaceful world.

---

I seem to recall that the message of Remembrance Day many years ago was “never again.” What happened to that? Why has that slogan been discarded? Sadly, I think I know the reason. Here we are, a century removed from World War I, with global conflicts constantly taking place wherein thousands are slaughtered or maimed for reasons very few can fathom. To say “never again” seems a little silly, doesn’t it? An appropriate aphorism for Remembrance Day comes from George Santayana — “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." There is a more chilling, and I’m afraid more apt statement from him — "Only the dead have seen the end of war."

War is dreadful, and I mourn the fallen soldiers on both sides of a battle; not to mention the “collateral damage" of massacred innocents. Supporting troops is one thing. Supporting decisions by so-called leaders that would have young lives cut short for a political agenda is another. On the positive side, we live in a relatively peaceful country where sabre-rattling is not a trait we are known for. Even so, we shouldn’t believe that all causes are noble. They are not. Or that all wars are just. They rarely are. 

---

Here’s an idea: Let’s replace “In Flanders Field” with “Dulce Et Decorum Est” by Wilfred Owen as the poem for recitation each and every Remembrance Day.

Dulce Et Decorum Est

Bent double, like old beggars under sacks,
Knock-kneed, coughing like hags, we cursed through sludge,
Till on the haunting flares we turned our backs
And towards our distant rest began to trudge.
Men marched asleep. Many had lost their boots
But limped on, blood-shod. All went lame; all blind;
Drunk with fatigue; deaf even to the hoots
Of tired, outstripped Five-Nines that dropped behind.|
Gas! Gas! Quick, boys!-An ecstasy of fumbling,
Fitting the clumsy helmets just in time;
But someone still was yelling out and stumbling
And flound'ring like a man in fire or lime...
Dim, through the misty panes and thick green light,
As under a green sea, I saw him drowning.
In all my dreams, before my helpless sight,
He plunges at me, guttering, choking, drowning.
If in some smothering dreams you too could pace
Behind the wagon that we flung him in,
And watch the white eyes writhing in his face,
His hanging face, like a devil's sick of sin;
If you could hear, at every jolt, the blood
Come gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs,

Obscene as cancer, bitter as the cud
Of vile, incurable sores on innocent tongues,-
My friend, you would not tell with such high zest
To children ardent for some desperate glory,
The old Lie: Dulce et decorum est
Pro patria mori.

The Latin phrase that ends that poem translates as, “It is sweet and proper to die for one's country.” The poet presents it as a “lie.”  It is a lie to be sure, but even more, it is a silly and frankly disgusting quote from the Roman poet Horace. Sweet and proper to die? For one’s country? How insane!


Saturday, December 6, 2025

God On A Chalkboard?

Dictionary.com defines ism as “a distinctive doctrine, theory, system, or practice:
This is the age of isms."

It sure as hell ism.

People often ask me if I believe in God, or they may ask what religious belief or philosophy I follow or observe. If pressed, I would say that I am a Pantheist; regardless of how different or diverse things appear, it seems obvious to me that everything arises from One. However, I loathe labels and prefer not to place an identifying stamp on anything which is continually evolving, including myself. 

Life is dynamic. Words and names are static. They are used as tools, so to speak, to define or describe that which is, but they fall pitifully short in that regard. To put a static label on something that is constantly changing is to deny its true nature.

Then we have that ism suffix; a suffix which somehow reduces every such word to a relatively insignificant belief or theory, due to the overabundance of those so-described philosophies. Pantheism finds its place alongside panentheism, pandeism, monotheism, monodeism, monism, deism, nondualism, dualism, agnosticism, atheism, et cetera ad nauseamism.

Words are a problem. We get so lost in them and so easily bamboozled by them.

Gurus, mystics, spiritualists, and the like must use words in any attempt to reveal Truth to their readers and listeners. But words can only represent the Ultimate Reality or Truth. They can never, ever reveal it; just as they can never truly describe the ever changing you.

The mystic Theoron Felson said, "There is nothing wrong with asking "What is God?" or "What is the meaning of life?" — go ahead and ask. Humans, by their very nature, want answers to all of life’s mysteries. The problem lies in formulating a satisfactory response through the use of language, which is little more than an expression of the limited egocentric mind."

One can dissect and analyze virtually any subject to the point of exhaustion, and still not come up with a definitive conclusion. This is particularly true in philosophy and spirituality. When one gets to that unfathomable subject of the Silent Source, the Eternal, or God if you will, then all the world's available data and words fail miserably. 

A Wikipedia article about the great philosopher Alan Watts, says in part:

His lectures and books gave Watts far-reaching influence on the American intelligentsia of the 1950s-1970s, but Watts was often seen as an outsider in academia. When questioned sharply by students during his talk at U.C. Santa Cruz in 1970, Watts responded that he was not an academic philosopher, but rather "a philosophical entertainer."

What has academia to do with spirituality?  In what manner would these questions — however “sharply” posed — have influenced the musings of a mystic such as Mr. Watts? (I've joked that many of these students likely wouldn't have known a sutra from a suture, or a satra from a Sinatra.)

There seems to be an erroneous assumption that through analytical thought, intense study, investigation, scrutiny, and dissection, we can find the Source. But the Truth has never been and never will be found through a series of chalkboard equations pored over by the world’s greatest physicists. Nor will colossal volumes of intelligent discourse from the most brilliant minds bring any seeker closer to the Way.

---

Joshu asked the teacher Nansen, "What is the True Way?"
Nansen answered, "Every way is the True Way."
Joshu asked, "Can I study it?"
Nansen answered, "The more you study, the further from the Way."
Joshu asked, "If I don't study it, how can I know it?"
Nansen answered, "The Way does not belong to things seen: nor to things unseen. It does not belong to things known: nor to things unknown. Do not seek it, study it, or name it. To find yourself on it, open yourself as wide as the sky."

---

A master was asked the question, "What is the Way?" by a curious monk.
"It is right before your eyes," said the master.
"Why do I not see it for myself?"
"Because you are thinking of yourself."
"What about you: do you see it?"
"So long as you see double, saying 'I don't,' and 'you do,' and so on, your eyes are clouded," said the master.
"When there is neither 'I' nor 'you,' can one see it?"
"When there is neither 'I' nor 'you,' who is the one that wants to see it?"

---

Questions, conjecture, and theories abound;
Some of them groundless, some of them sound.

Born of desire, the mind feels compelled,
To reach out and grasp what cannot be held.

The past and the future are offsprings of thought;
I must attend to the present if I am to be taught.

Questions, thoughts, theories — best placed on a shelf,
When attempting to know the Unknowable Self.

Tuesday, December 17, 2024

The Seeker And The One

Many of us seek an answer to the mystery of life; an ultimate goal. However, that search will bear no fruit. The seeker and that which is being sought are one and the same. We seek communion with God, or a sense of oneness without realizing that we are already one with the Universe. There is no goal to be reached but, rather, a realization needs to take place.

The search for spiritual fulfillment is part of a great drama of Life, as is the result of that search: the state of enlightenment. However, this great drama is not being presented to anyone outside of the One. We, as individuals, do not exist. That is an illusion created by dualistic thought. You can’t separate yourself from the Whole. The world and your environment are as much a part of you as is your heart or your brain. If you don’t believe me, just try living on the Moon or Mars (that is without artificially recreating an Earthlike environment).

So we are a part of the Earth. The Earth is part of the Solar System, which is part of the Milky Way galaxy, which is part of the Universe. We exist because the Universe does, and the Universe exists because we do. It is mutual. In fact, it is One.

A social website once posed the question, "If you were enlightened, how would your life be different?" I posted the following quotes:

Strong wine, fat meat, peppery things, very sweet things, these have not real taste; real taste is plain and simple. Supernatural, extraordinary feats do not characterize a real man; a real man is quite ordinary in behavior. 
From "The Gospel According to Zen"

Before enlightenment; chop wood, carry water. After enlightenment; chop wood, carry water.
- Old Zen Proverb

What is enlightenment? Who is enlightened? Who is not enlightened?

The distracted or unenlightened mind is filled with anxiety and thoughts — wondering "How long will it take to complete these chores?", "How will these actions affect the rest of my day?", and "Oh, I wish I were doing something else".

The undivided or enlightened mind is only concerned with this moment — carrying out tasks as simply as any other present moment activity.

What is referred to as enlightenment is simply that realization wherein the illusion of ego and a world of separate individuals and things vanishes. It cannot be attained by seeking, as it is the seeker (the ego-image) that must vanish.

If it’s spiritual enlightenment you're after, you won’t likely find it through your meetings with a spiritual coach or through some enlightenment seminar. If you are promised as much, then those making the promise should be treated with skepticism. They may not be the enlightened beings they claim to be (and they may have an ulterior motive; namely, the acquisition of some of your hard-earned cash).

A truly enlightened person is not likely to refer to themself as such (i.e., an enlightened individual) to the exclusion of all others. The answers you seek are all within you at this moment and a true guru will urge you to look inward for your True Self.

The light of the One shines now; and it does so on Its own. Nothing needs to be done but to experience it as it is in this moment.

Monday, December 9, 2024

No More War?

 

The little girl saw her first troop parade and asked,
'What are those?'
'Soldiers.'
'What are soldiers?'
'They are for war. They fight and each tries to kill as many of the other side as he can.'
The girl held still and studied.
'Do you know . . . I know something?'
'Yes, what is it you know?'
'Sometime they'll give a war and nobody will come.'
- Carl Sandburg from his poem The People, Yes

Wouldn't it be nice if that little girl was right? Sadly, with our current global mindset, I fear that it is just a pipe dream.

Surely, if enough people decided not to participate in war, then we might see an end to these senseless large-scale conflicts. But how do we go about creating this widespread acceptance of peace over war?

In a Remembrance Day post of mine, I stated that if I am to mourn those who died due to the madness of war, then I mourn every soldier who died; regardless of which “side” they were on.

I refuse to support “our” troops or to take place in a military ceremony commemorating “our” fallen comrades, lest “we” forget. I refuse to oppose those dirty rotten “others”. This “us” vs. “them” mentality is what brings about war in the first place. Is it not obvious that this is the source of all conflict?

As Jiddu Krishnamurti said, "When you call yourself an Indian or a Muslim or a Christian or a European, or anything else, you are being violent. Do you see why it is violent? Because you are separating yourself from the rest of mankind. When you separate yourself by belief, by nationality, by tradition, it breeds violence. So a man who is seeking to understand violence does not belong to any country, to any religion, to any political party or partial system; he is concerned with the total understanding of mankind."

On the other hand, the poem  In Flanders Fields exhorts us to “Take up our quarrel with the foe...”

What foe?

All persons on this planet are my brothers and sisters. We are undeniably tied to everyone and everything. When we fight someone else, we fight ourselves. We create enemies that don’t really exist.

To put an end to war forever, we need a new direction. But where do we go? Who do we turn to? The UN? NATO? Our elected “leaders”? Organized religion? (God help us). No. None of these have ever demonstrated the ability to bring about lasting peace, and they never will.

We need to realize our connection to each other; and not just realize it intellectually, but actually feel it and live it. It must be a full time occupation. We must abandon our egocentric thoughts and behavior in favor of an identity with the Whole of existence. This is the only thing that will prevent large scale conflicts altogether. Only you, the individual — who, in reality, is not an individual but a part of the Whole — can create peace. It must come from within.

Only peaceful souls can effect a peaceful world.


Sunday, December 1, 2024

How To Effect Real Social Change

An iron-handed government is toppled. A war ends. Rights are granted to an oppressed minority. These are results that have been gained through social activism. But, a new despot lurks in the shadows, and a new war is brewing over some idiotic cause. Prejudice, fear and hatred toward others continues.

Society is just another name for the ego-driven populace. So-called social change does absolutely nothing to drive the ego illusion from our collective minds: no real change takes place at all. Old problems are inevitably replaced by new ones.

No demonstration, march, social protest, or fight is going to bring about peace on this planet. Yes, we can defeat a Hitler by standing up and giving him a collective and well-deserved punch in the nose. But a new bully will surely appear somewhere and a new crisis begins. The up and down drama of life goes on.

I am not advocating passivity nor am I advocating action. Rather, I would suggest a passive action based on a shift in thought; a shift that will ultimately result in how you react to a situation.  

Peace can’t be forced. Peace and happiness are natural states that arise when we dwell in the silent Source. There, ego fades and the death of the “self” is replaced by the emergent True Self. 

The ego-mind is always searching, always struggling, always fighting, always looking ahead, never content. It’s easy to see that an ego-driven society is doomed to a state of unrest.

Abandon the image of a separate you. Identify with the One for meaningful change and true lasting peace.

Sunday, November 24, 2024

An Effortless Life

They say that with age comes wisdom. But does it?

What knowledge do I possess now that I did not thirty, forty, or fifty years ago? Exactly who is it that is now wise, where he was once “unwise”? Was I not already endowed — from birth — with all of the essential qualities needed to fully experience and appreciate life? Have I not always been able to see, hear, smell, taste, and touch? Have I not always been a “child of the Universe”?

Real wisdom is inherent in everyone. We know how to live; how to exist; and we do. Moreover, we live without effort; but our limited conscious minds tell us otherwise.

Does real living require any effort? It takes no effort to see, hear, touch, smell or taste. Really think about the following: no mental or physical exertion is required for your heart to beat; thoughts come and go — effortlessly;  the blood circulates; breathing goes in and out as the body maintains a proper temperature; food is digested and the body rids itself of waste; hair and nails grow; the mouth stays moist with saliva; cuts and bruises heal on their own. All of this, and more, happens with no conscious effort.

Everything which is done without conscious attention is done effortlessly. When ego and conscious attention get in the way, a struggle ensues and life seems difficult. 

Imagine trying, through force, to taste, hear, smell, feel, and see. Just try using your conscious attention to stop thoughts from entering your mind. It's impossible.

When restless thoughts do subside, they do so not by effort, but by an acceptance and appreciation of the present experience. Then we see beyond concepts, duality, and all the illusions created by the ego-conscious mind. Then we experience life as it is — an effortless expression of the True Self.


Sunday, November 17, 2024

A Thief Leaves The Moon

Ryokan, a Zen master, lived the simplest kind of life in a little hut at the foot of a mountain. One evening a thief visited the hut only to discover there was nothing in it to steal. 

Ryokan returned and caught him. “You may have come a long way to visit me,” he told the prowler, “and you should not return empty-handed. Please take my clothes as a gift.” 

The thief was bewildered. He took the clothes and slunk away. 

Ryokan sat naked, watching the moon. “Poor fellow,” he mused, “I wish I could give him this beautiful moon."